Chapter 3. Geometrical Optics & Photons

Part 3: Geometrical Optics

1. Optical Path

Optical Path: $\Delta = ct = nvt = ns$

Optical Path Difference: $\delta = n_1 s_1 - n_2 s_2$

(Speed of light $c = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon_0 \mu_0}}$, $v = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon\mu}}$, $n = \sqrt{\epsilon_r\mu_r}$)

Fermat's Principle: Light travels along the path with the shortest or longest optical path, $\int_A^B n ds = \text{extremum}$.

2. Reflection of Light

Light Reflection

Let points be $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2, y_2)$ and the point of reflection be $(x, 0)$.

$$ \Delta = n \sqrt{(x_1-x)^2+y_1^2} + n \sqrt{(x_2-x)^2+y_2^2} $$ $$ \frac{d\Delta}{dx} = n\frac{1}{2}\frac{2(x_1-x)(-dx)}{\sqrt{(x_1-x)^2+y_1^2}} + n\frac{1}{2}\frac{2(x_2-x)(-dx)}{\sqrt{(x_2-x)^2+y_2^2}} = 0 $$ $$ \therefore \frac{x-x_1}{\sqrt{(x-x_1)^2+y_1^2}} = \frac{x_2-x}{\sqrt{(x_2-x)^2+y_2^2}} $$ $$ \therefore \sin i_1 = \sin i_2 $$

3. Refraction of Light

Light Refraction $$ \Delta = n_1 \sqrt{(x_1-x)^2+y_1^2} + n_2 \sqrt{(x_2-x)^2+y_2^2} $$ $$ \frac{d\Delta}{dx} = n_1 \frac{1}{2}\frac{-2(x_1-x)dx}{\sqrt{(x_1-x)^2+y_1^2}} + n_2 \frac{1}{2}\frac{-(x_2-x)dx}{\sqrt{(x_2-x)^2+y_2^2}} = 0 $$ $$ \therefore n_1 \frac{x-x_1}{\sqrt{(x-x_1)^2+y_1^2}} = n_2 \frac{x_2-x}{\sqrt{(x_2-x)^2+y_2^2}} $$ $$ \therefore \sin i_1 \cdot n_1 = \sin i_2 \cdot n_2 $$

4. Total Internal Reflection

$\frac{\sin i_1}{\sin i_2} = \frac{n_2}{n_1}$. When $\sin i_2 = 1$, i.e., the angle of refraction is $90^\circ$, total internal reflection occurs.

At this time $\sin\alpha = \frac{n_2}{n_1}$, $\alpha = \arcsin \frac{n_2}{n_1}$ ($n_1 = \frac{c}{v_1}$, the optically denser medium has larger $n$, the optically rarer medium has smaller $n$).

Special Topic: Photons

1. Theoretical Foundation

$$ E = h\nu, \quad P = \frac{h\nu}{c} = \frac{h}{\lambda} $$ $$ \because E^2 = P^2 c^2 + m_0^2 c^4 \text{, and } m_0 = 0 \quad \therefore P = \frac{E}{c} $$ $$ \because m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} = \sqrt{\frac{E^2-P^2c^2}{c^4}}{\frac{c^2-v^2}{c^2}} = \frac{\sqrt{E^2-P^2c^2}}{c\sqrt{c^2-v^2}} = \frac{\sqrt{h^2\nu^2-P^2c^2}}{c\sqrt{c^2-v^2}} $$ $$ = \sqrt{\frac{\frac{h^2c^2}{\lambda^2}-m^2c^4}{c^2(c^2-v^2)}} = \sqrt{\frac{\frac{h^2}{\lambda^2}-m^2c^2}{c^2-v^2}} $$ $$ \therefore m^2(c^2-v^2) = \frac{h^2}{\lambda^2} - m^2c^2 \quad \therefore m^2(2c^2-v^2) = \frac{h^2}{\lambda^2} $$ $$ \because v = c, \quad \therefore m = \frac{h}{c\lambda} = \frac{h\nu}{c^2} \quad \text{This is the dynamic mass of the photon.} $$

2. Light Pressure

Momentum of a group of photons $P = \frac{Nh\nu}{c} = \frac{\Phi}{c}$

If the reflection coefficient of the wall is $\rho$, then $\Delta I_1 = P\frac{\Phi}{c} - (-P\frac{\Phi}{c}) = 2\rho\frac{\Phi}{c}$.

The remaining $(1-\rho)N$ photons are absorbed by the wall, then $\Delta I_2 = (1-\rho)\frac{\Phi}{c}$.

$$ \therefore \text{Light Pressure } = \Delta I_1 + \Delta I_2 = (1+\rho)\frac{\Phi}{c} $$

3. Derivation of the Law of Reflection

Photon Momentum Reflection $$ \begin{cases} h\nu + \frac{1}{2}MV^2 = h\nu' + \frac{1}{2}MV'^2 \quad (1) \\ MV - \frac{h\nu\cos\alpha}{c} = MV' + \frac{h\nu'\cos\alpha'}{c} \quad (2) \\ \frac{h\nu\sin\alpha}{c} = \frac{h\nu'\sin\alpha'}{c} \quad (3) \end{cases} $$

From (1) we get $h(\nu-\nu') = \frac{1}{2}M(V'^2-V^2)$

From (2) we get $\frac{h}{c}(\nu\cos\alpha + \nu'\cos\alpha') = M(V-V')$

$$ \therefore c\frac{\nu-\nu'}{\nu\cos\alpha + \nu'\cos\alpha'} = \frac{1}{2}(V+V') \approx V $$

From (3) we get $\nu' = \frac{\sin\alpha}{\sin\alpha'}\nu$, substitute into the above equation:

$$ V = \frac{\frac{\sin\alpha}{\sin\alpha'}-1}{\cos\alpha + \frac{\sin\alpha}{\sin\alpha'}\cos\alpha'} c = \frac{\sin\alpha-\sin\alpha'}{\sin\alpha'\cos\alpha+\sin\alpha\cos\alpha'} c = \frac{\sin\alpha-\sin\alpha'}{\sin(\alpha+\alpha')} c $$ $$ \text{i.e. } \sin\alpha - \sin\alpha' = \beta \sin(\alpha+\alpha') \text{. If } V \text{ is in the opposite direction, then } \sin\alpha - \sin\alpha' = \beta\sin\alpha\sin(\alpha+\alpha') $$

4. Redshift Velocity Measurement

Redshift Simple $$ \begin{cases} \frac{h}{\lambda} + MV = -\frac{h}{\lambda'} + MV' \\ \frac{hc}{\lambda} + \frac{1}{2}MV^2 = \frac{hc}{\lambda'} + \frac{1}{2}MV'^2 \end{cases} $$ $$ \therefore h(\frac{1}{\lambda} + \frac{1}{\lambda'}) = M(V'-V) $$ $$ \therefore hc(\frac{1}{\lambda} - \frac{1}{\lambda'}) = \frac{1}{2}M(V'^2-V^2) $$ $$ \therefore c \frac{\frac{1}{\lambda}-\frac{1}{\lambda'}}{\frac{1}{\lambda}+\frac{1}{\lambda'}} = \frac{1}{2}(V'+V) \approx V $$ $$ \therefore V = \frac{\lambda'-\lambda}{\lambda'+\lambda} c $$

Define redshift $Z = \frac{\lambda'-\lambda}{\lambda}$, $\therefore V = (\frac{Z}{2+Z}) c$

5. Gravitational Redshift

Gravitational Redshift $$ h\nu - \frac{GmM}{r} = h\nu' - \frac{GmM}{r'} $$ $$ \therefore h\nu(1 - \frac{GM}{c^2r}) = h\nu'(1 - \frac{GM}{c^2r'}) $$ $$ \therefore \nu' = \frac{1 - \frac{GM}{c^2r}}{1 - \frac{GM}{c^2r'}} \nu $$

6. Compton Effect

Compton Effect

From conservation of momentum and the law of cosines:

$$ (mv)^2 = (\frac{h\nu}{c})^2 + (\frac{h\nu'}{c})^2 - 2\frac{h\nu}{c}\frac{h\nu'}{c}\cos\theta $$

From conservation of energy:

$$ m_0c^2 + h\nu = mc^2 + h\nu' $$

From $m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}$, we get $m^2c^2 = m^2v^2 + m_0^2c^2$. $\therefore (mc^2)^2 = (mv)^2c^2 + m_0^2c^4$.

Substitute the previous two equations into this equation:

$$ (m_0c^2 + h\nu - h\nu')^2 = \left[ (\frac{h\nu}{c})^2 + (\frac{h\nu'}{c})^2 - \frac{2h^2\nu\nu'\cos\theta}{c^2} \right] c^2 + m_0^2c^4 $$

Expanding yields: $m_0^2c^4 + 2m_0c^2h(\nu-\nu') + h^2(\nu-\nu')^2 = h^2\nu^2 + h^2\nu'^2 - 2h^2\nu\nu'\cos\theta + m_0^2c^4$

$$ \therefore m_0c^2(\nu-\nu') = h\nu\nu'(1-\cos\theta) $$ $$ \therefore \frac{\nu-\nu'}{\nu\nu'} \approx \frac{\Delta\nu}{\nu^2} = \frac{2h}{m_0c^2}\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} $$

7. Atomic Emission Recoil

Atomic Emission Recoil

Neglecting the change in atomic mass, from conservation of energy and conservation of momentum, we get:

$$ \begin{cases} \frac{P_n^2}{2M} + E_n = \frac{P_m^2}{2M} + E_m + h\nu \\ P_m^2 = P_n^2 + P^2 - 2P_n P\cos\alpha \end{cases} $$ $$ \therefore \nu = \frac{E_n-E_m}{h} + \frac{2P_n P}{2Mh}\cos\alpha - \frac{P^2}{2Mh} \quad (\because P_n = Mv_n, P = \frac{h\nu}{c}) $$ $$ \therefore \nu = \nu_0 + \frac{v_n}{c}\nu\cos\alpha - \frac{h\nu^2}{2Mc^2} \approx \nu_0 + \frac{v_n}{c}\nu_0\cos\alpha - \frac{h\nu_0^2}{2Mc^2} $$

The first term is the Bohr frequency.

The second term is the Doppler effect. When $v_n = 0$, this term is zero. $\nu = \nu_0 - \frac{h\nu_0^2}{2Mc^2}$.

The third term is the result of atomic recoil.

5. Mirror Imaging

① Plane Mirror:

Determine the number of virtual images: Let the object emit a light ray to each mirror, let the light ray reflect between the mirrors until it exits the system. The reverse extension of each reflected ray must pass through a virtual image.

Plane Mirror Imaging

Real Image: The image formed by the convergence of actual light rays.

Virtual Image: The image formed by the convergence of the backward extensions of light rays.

② Spherical Mirror:

Convex Spherical Mirror Concave Spherical Mirror

From the figure, $\frac{y}{-v} = \frac{y'}{u} \approx \frac{u-R+\frac{R}{2}}{\frac{R}{2}} = \frac{u-\frac{R}{2}}{\frac{R}{2}}$

$$ \text{Yields } \frac{1}{u} + \frac{1}{v} = \frac{2}{R} = \frac{1}{f} \quad (f = \frac{R}{2} \text{, paraxial approximation}) $$

Sign Convention: Object is in front of the mirror (the side that can reflect light), $u > 0$; object is behind the mirror, $u < 0$.

Real image, $v > 0$; Virtual image, $v < 0$ (Do not add signs when calculating, determine the sign after solving).

Concave mirror $f > 0$; Convex mirror $f < 0$.

Magnification: Magnification of an upright image

$$ K = \frac{y'}{y} = \frac{v-R}{u-R} = \frac{v - \frac{2uv}{u+v}}{u - \frac{2uv}{u+v}} = \frac{v^2-uv}{u^2-uv} = -\frac{v}{u} $$ $$ \text{i.e. } K = -\frac{v}{u} $$

6. Lens Imaging

① Single Spherical Surface Refraction

Single Spherical Surface Refraction

According to Fermat's principle, the optical path of ray $QMQ'$ is equal to that of $QAHCQ'$.

$$ \therefore QU \cdot n + MQ \cdot n' = QA \cdot n + AQ' \cdot n' $$ $$ \because QH \approx QP, \quad Q'H \approx Q'O $$ $$ \therefore QP \cdot n + PM \cdot n + MO \cdot n' = QA \cdot n + AH \cdot n' = (QH-AH)n + AH \cdot n' $$ $$ \therefore PM \cdot n + MO \cdot n' = AH(n'-n) \quad (1) $$

According to the paraxial approximation formula in geometry, for the paraxial ray $QMQ'$:

$$ PM \approx \frac{h^2}{2u}, \quad MO \approx \frac{h^2}{2v} \quad (2) $$

And from the intersecting chords theorem $AH(2R-AH) = h^2 \approx AH \cdot 2R$

$$ \therefore AH = \frac{h^2}{2R} \quad (3) $$

Substituting (2) and (3) into (1) gives $\frac{h^2}{2u} n + \frac{h^2}{2v} n' = \frac{h^2}{2R}(n'-n)$

$$ \because s \approx u, \quad s' \approx v $$ $$ \therefore \frac{n}{u} + \frac{n'}{v} = \frac{n'-n}{R} $$

Focal length: $\begin{cases} \text{Object focal length: } v \to \infty, u = \frac{Rn}{n'-n} = f_1 \\ \text{Image focal length: } u \to \infty, v = \frac{Rn'}{n'-n} = f_2 \end{cases}$

Sign Convention: The order of $n'-n$ in the formula is unchanged, only the signs of $u, v, R$ change.

$$ \begin{cases} Q \text{ (object) is to the left of vertex } A, u > 0, \text{ otherwise negative.} \\ Q' \text{ (image) is to the right of vertex } A, v > 0, \text{ otherwise negative.} \\ C \text{ (center of curvature) is to the right of } A, \text{defined as } R > 0, \text{ otherwise negative.} \end{cases} $$

Magnification: $K = \frac{y'}{y} = -\frac{v/n'}{u/n} = -\frac{nv}{n'u}$.

② Thin Lens Imaging

Thin Lens Imaging

For the left spherical surface: $\frac{n_1}{u} + \frac{n}{v_1} = \frac{n-n_1}{R_1}$

For the right spherical surface: $-\frac{n}{v_1} + \frac{n_2}{v} = \frac{n_2-n}{R_2}$

$$ \therefore \frac{n_1}{u} + \frac{n_2}{v} = (n-1)\left(\frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2}\right) \quad (\text{Special case: } n_1 = n_2 = 1, f = \frac{1}{(n-1)(\frac{1}{R_1}+\frac{1}{R_2})}) $$

For the general case: $\frac{n_1}{u} + \frac{n_2}{v} = \frac{n-n_1}{R_1} - \frac{n_2-n}{-R_2}$

$$ \therefore \frac{n_1}{u} + \frac{n_2}{v} = \frac{n-n_1}{R_1} + \frac{n-n_2}{R_2} $$

When $\frac{n-n_1}{R_1} + \frac{n-n_2}{R_2} > 0$, it is a converging lens, conversely a diverging lens.

Focal length: $\begin{cases} \text{Object focal length: } v \to \infty, u = \frac{n_1}{\frac{n-n_1}{R_1} + \frac{n-n_2}{R_2}} = f_1 \\ \text{Image focal length: } u \to \infty, v = \frac{n_2}{\frac{n-n_1}{R_1} + \frac{n-n_2}{R_2}} = f_2 \end{cases}$

$$ \therefore \frac{f_1}{u} + \frac{f_2}{v} = 1 $$

Let $u = x_1 + f_1$, $v = x_2 + f_2$

$$ \therefore \frac{f_1}{x_1+f_1} + \frac{f_2}{x_2+f_2} = 1 \implies f_1 x_2 + f_1 f_2 + f_2 x_1 + f_2 f_1 = x_1 x_2 + x_1 f_2 + f_1 x_2 + f_1 f_2 $$ $$ \text{Yields } x_1 x_2 = f_1 f_2 $$

Sign Convention: Real object $u > 0$, virtual object $u < 0$. Real image $v > 0$, virtual image $v < 0$. Convex lens $f > 0$, concave lens $f < 0$.

Magnification: $K = K_1 \cdot K_2 = \left(-\frac{v_1/n}{u/n_1}\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{v/n_2}{-v_1/n}\right) = -\frac{n_1 v}{n_2 u}$.

Proof of equal optical path for paraxial rays in thin lenses:

Paraxial Rays Proof $$ \Delta(PAA'P') - \Delta(POO'P') = (PA + n \cdot AA' + A'P') - (PO + n \cdot OO' + O'P') $$ $$ = (PE + EA + n \cdot AA' + A'F + FP') - [PM - OM + n(OM + MN + NO) + NP' - NO'] $$

$\because P'A' \approx MN = b, \quad PE \approx PM, \quad P'F \approx P'N$

$$ \text{Original expression } = EA + A'F + OM + NO' - n \cdot OM - n \cdot NO' $$ $$ \approx \frac{h^2}{2 \cdot PA} + \frac{h^2}{2 \cdot P'A'} + \frac{h^2}{2r_1} + \frac{h^2}{2r_2} - n\frac{h^2}{2r_1} - n\frac{h^2}{2r_2} $$ $$ = \frac{h^2}{2} \left[ \frac{1}{u} + \frac{1}{v} + (1-n)\left(\frac{1}{r_1} + \frac{1}{r_2}\right) \right] = \frac{h^2}{2} \left( \frac{1}{u} + \frac{1}{v} - \frac{1}{f} \right) = 0 $$ $$ \therefore \Delta(PAA'P') = \Delta(POO'P') $$

Proof of $\Delta \approx \frac{h^2}{2s}$:

$$ \because \sqrt{s^2-h^2} = s - \Delta $$ $$ \therefore s^2 - h^2 = s^2 - 2s\Delta + \Delta^2 $$ $$ \because \Delta^2 \approx 0 \quad \therefore \Delta = \frac{h^2}{2s} $$

③ Graphical Method

1) Characteristic Ray Method:

Characteristic Rays

2) Arbitrary Ray Method:

Rays parallel to the secondary optical axis pass through the intersection of the focal plane and the secondary optical axis after refraction by the lens.

Explanation: Treat $M$ as a real object. Since it is on the focal plane, it cannot form an image. This means the rays emitted from it must be parallel to the ray passing through the optical center after refraction. As shown in the figure:

Arbitrary Rays

Special Topic: Silvered Lenses

1. Plano-Convex Thin Lens (Radius $R$, Refractive Index $n$)

Silvered Plano-Convex

(The diagram shows the plane surface silvered, and the ray enters from the convex surface).

$$ \frac{1}{u} + \frac{n}{v_1} = \frac{n-1}{R}, \text{ after reflection } u' = -v_1 \implies -\frac{n}{v_1} + \frac{1}{v} = \frac{1-n}{-R} \text{ (positive direction reversed)} $$ $$ \text{Solving yields } v = \frac{1}{-\frac{1}{u} + \frac{2(n-1)}{R}} $$ $$ \text{Magnification } K = \left(-\frac{v_1/n}{u/1}\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{v/1}{-v_1/n}\right) = -\frac{v}{u} $$

Focal length: When parallel light enters:

$$ \begin{cases} \frac{1}{\infty} + \frac{n}{v_1} = \frac{n-1}{R} \\ -\frac{n}{v_1} + \frac{1}{f} = \frac{1-n}{-R} \end{cases} \implies f = \frac{R}{2(n-1)} $$

2. Plano-Concave Thin Lens (Radius $R$, Refractive Index $n$)

Silvered Plano-Concave $$ \frac{1}{u} + \frac{n}{v_1} = \frac{n-1}{-R}, \text{ after reflection } u' = -v_1 \implies -\frac{n}{v_1} + \frac{1}{v} = \frac{1-n}{R} \text{ (positive direction reversed)} $$ $$ \text{Solving yields } v = \frac{1}{-\frac{1}{u} - \frac{2(n-1)}{R}} $$ $$ \text{Magnification } K = \left(-\frac{v_1/n}{u/1}\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{v/1}{-v_1/n}\right) = -\frac{v}{u} $$

Focal length: When parallel light enters:

$$ \begin{cases} \frac{1}{\infty} + \frac{n}{v_1} = \frac{n-1}{-R} \\ -\frac{n}{v_1} + \frac{1}{f} = \frac{1-n}{R} \end{cases} \implies f = -\frac{R}{2(n-1)} $$

3. Plano-Convex Thin Lens (Curved Surface Silvered)

Silvered Curved Plano-Convex $$ \because \frac{v_1}{u} \approx \frac{v_1/n}{u/1} = n \implies u' = nu $$ $$ \text{Or: } \frac{1}{u} + \frac{n}{v_1} = \frac{n-1}{\infty} = 0 \implies v_1 = -nu, \quad \therefore u' = -v_1 = nu $$ $$ \because \frac{n}{u'} + \frac{n}{v''} = -\frac{2n}{-R} \implies \frac{1}{v''} = -\frac{2}{R} - \frac{1}{u'} $$ $$ \because v = \frac{v''}{n} = \frac{1}{n} \left( -\frac{2}{R} - \frac{1}{nu} \right)^{-1} $$ $$ \text{Focal length: } \frac{1}{f} \approx n\left(-\frac{2}{R}\right) \implies f = -\frac{R}{2n} $$ $$ \text{Magnification: } K = -\frac{v''}{u'} = \frac{nv}{nu} \dots \implies K = -\frac{v}{u} $$

4. Plano-Concave Thin Lens (Curved Surface Silvered)

Silvered Curved Plano-Concave $$ \because \frac{v_1}{u} \approx \frac{v_1/n}{u/1} = n \implies u' = nu $$ $$ \text{Or: } \frac{1}{u} + \frac{n}{v_1} = 0 \implies v_1 = -nu, \quad \therefore u' = -v_1 = nu $$ $$ \because \frac{n}{u'} + \frac{n}{v''} = \frac{2n}{R} \implies \frac{1}{v''} = \frac{2}{R} - \frac{1}{u'} $$ $$ \because v = \frac{v''}{n} = \frac{1}{n} \left( \frac{2}{R} - \frac{1}{nu} \right)^{-1} $$ $$ \text{Focal length: } \frac{1}{f} \approx n\left(\frac{2}{R}\right) \implies f = \frac{R}{2n} $$ $$ \text{Magnification: } K = -\frac{v''}{u'} = \dots \implies K = -\frac{v}{u} $$

5. Convexo-Concave Thin Lens (Radius $R_1, R_2$, Refractive Index $n$)

Silvered Convexo-Concave $$ \frac{1}{u} + \frac{n}{v_1} = \frac{n-1}{R_1}, \quad u_2 = -v_1, \quad \frac{n}{u_2} + \frac{n}{v_2} = -\frac{2n}{R_2} $$ $$ u_3 = -v_2, \quad \frac{n}{u_3} + \frac{1}{v} = \frac{1-n}{-R_1} \text{ (positive direction reversed)} $$ $$ \therefore \frac{1}{v} = \frac{2(n-1)}{R_1} + \frac{2n}{R_2} - \frac{1}{u} $$ $$ \text{Focal length: } u \to \infty, \quad f = \frac{1}{\frac{2(n-1)}{R_1} + \frac{2n}{R_2}} $$ $$ \text{Magnification: } K = \left(-\frac{v_1/n}{u/1}\right) \left(-\frac{v_2/n}{-v_1/n}\right) \left(-\frac{v/1}{-v_2/n}\right) = -\frac{v}{u} $$

7. Optical Instruments

① Human Eye

Human Eye

Distance of distinct vision: $d = 25\text{cm}$

This is the minimum distance at which the eye can see an image clearly. It is generally the distance from the image to the eye or eyepiece in optical instruments.

② Magnifying Glass

Magnifying Glass $$ K = \frac{\beta}{\alpha} \approx \frac{\tan\beta}{\tan\alpha} \approx \frac{y/f}{y/d} = \frac{d}{f} \quad (d: \text{distance of distinct vision}, f: \text{focal length}) $$

③ Microscope

Microscope $$ K = \frac{\beta}{\alpha} \approx \frac{A_2 B_2 / d}{AB / d} \approx \frac{A_1 B_1 / f_2}{AB / d} = \frac{v_1}{u_1} \cdot \frac{d}{f_2} \approx \frac{L}{f_1} \cdot \frac{d}{f_2} = \frac{L d}{f_1 f_2} $$

④ Keplerian Telescope

Keplerian Telescope $$ K = \frac{\beta}{\alpha} \approx \frac{A_1 B_1 / f_2}{A_1 B_1 / f_1} \approx \frac{f_1}{f_2} \quad \therefore \text{The smaller the eyepiece } f_2 \text{ and the larger the objective } f_1, \text{ the larger } K \text{ is.} $$

⑤ Galilean Telescope

Galilean Telescope $$ K = \frac{\beta}{\alpha} \approx \frac{A_1 B_1 / f_2}{A_1 B_1 / f_1} \approx \frac{f_1}{f_2} \quad \therefore \text{The smaller the eyepiece } f_2, \text{ the larger } K \text{ is.} $$

Part 4: Wave Optics

1. Interference of Light: Same frequency, same direction of vibration, fixed phase difference.

① Young's Double Slit Interference

Young's Double Slit

For point P, $\varphi_1 = A_1 \cos(\omega t - \frac{r_1}{v}) + \varphi_{01}, \quad \varphi_2 = A_2 \cos(\omega t - \frac{r_2}{v}) + \varphi_{02}$

$$ \therefore \Delta\varphi = \omega \frac{r_2-r_1}{v} + \varphi_{01} - \varphi_{02} $$ $$ \because \varphi_{01} = \varphi_{02} \quad \therefore \Delta\varphi = \frac{\omega}{v}(r_2-r_1) = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda}(r_2-r_1) = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda}\delta $$ $$ \therefore \delta = \frac{\Delta\varphi}{2\pi}\lambda $$ $$ \begin{cases} \text{If } \delta = k\lambda, \text{ i.e. } \frac{\Delta\varphi}{2\pi} = k, \text{ constructive interference.} \\ \text{If } \delta = \frac{2k+1}{2}\lambda, \text{ i.e. } \frac{\Delta\varphi}{2\pi} = \frac{2k+1}{2}, \text{ destructive interference.} \end{cases} $$ $$ \text{Also } \delta \approx \Delta s_1 = d\sin\theta \approx d\tan\theta = d\frac{y}{r_0} $$ $$ \therefore \begin{cases} \text{If } d\frac{y}{r_0} = k\lambda, \text{ i.e. } y = k\frac{r_0\lambda}{d}, \text{ constructive interference.} \\ \text{If } d\frac{y}{r_0} = \frac{2k+1}{2}\lambda, \text{ i.e. } y = \frac{2k+1}{2}\frac{r_0\lambda}{d}, \text{ destructive interference.} \end{cases} $$ $$ \therefore \text{Distance between bright/dark fringes } \Delta y = \frac{r_0\lambda}{d}. $$

2) Exact Solution:

If point P has constructive interference, i.e., maximum vibration, then the distance difference from P to the two point sources $S_1, S_2$ is

$$ \delta = 2k \cdot \frac{\lambda}{2} \quad (k = 0, 1, 2 \dots) $$

If $\lambda$ is constant, then $\delta$ is a constant. The locus of points with a constant distance difference to two fixed points is a hyperbola. The two light sources are the two foci of the hyperbola. With the line connecting $S_1 S_2$ as the y-axis, and the perpendicular bisector $OP_0$ as the x-axis:

$$ \because 2a = \delta = 2k \cdot \frac{\lambda}{2} \quad \therefore a = k\frac{\lambda}{2} $$ $$ \text{Also } c = \frac{d}{2} $$ $$ \therefore \frac{y^2}{(k\lambda/2)^2} - \frac{x^2}{(d/2)^2 - (k\lambda/2)^2} = 1 $$ $$ \text{When } x = r_0, \quad y = \pm k\frac{\lambda}{2} \sqrt{1 + \frac{r_0^2}{(d/2)^2 - (k\lambda/2)^2}} $$

Similarly, if point P has destructive interference, i.e., minimum vibration, we have:

$$ \frac{y^2}{(\frac{2k+1}{2}\frac{\lambda}{2})^2} - \frac{x^2}{(d/2)^2 - (\frac{2k+1}{2}\frac{\lambda}{2})^2} = 1 $$ $$ \text{When } x = r_0, \quad y = \pm \frac{2k+1}{2}\frac{\lambda}{2} \sqrt{1 + \frac{r_0^2}{(d/2)^2 - (\frac{2k+1}{2}\frac{\lambda}{2})^2}} $$

② Fresnel Biprism Interference

Fresnel Biprism

Take the upper half as the object of study: $n\sin i_1' \approx ni_1', \quad n\sin i_2' \approx ni_2', \quad i_1' + i_2' = A$.

$$ \therefore \theta = (i_1 - i_1') + (i_2 - i_2') \approx (n-1)i_1' + (n-1)i_2' = (n-1)A $$ $$ \text{Also } \theta \approx \frac{d/2}{l} \quad \therefore d = 2l(n-1)A $$ $$ \therefore \begin{cases} 2l(n-1)A \cdot \frac{y}{L+l} = k\lambda, \text{ constructive interference.} \\ 2l(n-1)A \cdot \frac{y}{L+l} = \frac{2k+1}{2}\lambda, \text{ destructive interference.} \end{cases} $$ $$ \Delta y = \frac{L+l}{2l(n-1)A} \cdot \lambda $$

③ Newton's Rings Interference

Newton's Rings $$ \delta = 2h - \frac{\lambda}{2} $$

(Because the light reflecting off the flat glass plate after passing through the convex lens undergoes a half-wave loss, the optical path difference decreases by $\frac{\lambda}{2}$.)

$$ \therefore \begin{cases} 2h - \frac{\lambda}{2} = 2k \cdot \frac{\lambda}{2}, \text{ i.e. } h = (2k+1)\frac{\lambda}{4}, \text{ constructive interference.} \\ \quad \text{At this time } r^2 = h(2R-h) \approx 2Rh, \quad r = \sqrt{2R(2k+1)\frac{\lambda}{4}} \\ 2h - \frac{\lambda}{2} = (2k-1)\frac{\lambda}{2}, \text{ i.e. } h = (2k)\frac{\lambda}{4}, \text{ destructive interference.} \\ \quad \text{At this time } r = \sqrt{2R \cdot 2k \frac{\lambda}{4}} = \sqrt{Rk\lambda} \end{cases} $$

④ Thin Film Interference

1) Equal Inclination Interference (Parallel light obliquely incident on a glass plate with parallel faces)

Equal Inclination Interference $$ \delta = n \cdot \frac{2h}{\cos\theta_2} - 2h\tan\theta_2\sin\theta_1 - \frac{\lambda}{2} \quad \text{(Light reflecting on the upper surface undergoes half-wave loss)} $$ $$ \because \sin\theta_1 = n\sin\theta_2 $$ $$ \therefore \delta = \frac{2nh - 2nh\sin^2\theta_2}{\cos\theta_2} - \frac{\lambda}{2} = \frac{2nh(1-\sin^2\theta_2)}{\cos\theta_2} - \frac{\lambda}{2} = 2nh\cos\theta_2 - \frac{\lambda}{2} $$ $$ \therefore \begin{cases} 2nh\cos\theta_2 - \frac{\lambda}{2} = 2k \cdot \frac{\lambda}{2}, \text{ i.e. } 2nh\cos\theta_2 = (2k+1)\frac{\lambda}{2}, \text{ constructive interference.} \\ 2nh\cos\theta_2 - \frac{\lambda}{2} = (2k-1)\frac{\lambda}{2}, \text{ i.e. } 2nh\cos\theta_2 = 2k\frac{\lambda}{2}, \text{ destructive interference.} \end{cases} $$

2) Equal Thickness Interference (Parallel light perpendicularly incident on a glass plate with a small angle of inclination)

Equal Thickness Interference $$ \begin{cases} h = (2k+1)\frac{\lambda}{4n\cos\theta_2} \approx (2k+1)\frac{\lambda}{4n}, \text{ constructive interference.} \\ h = 2k \cdot \frac{\lambda}{4n\cos\theta_2} \approx 2k \cdot \frac{\lambda}{4n}, \text{ destructive interference.} \end{cases} $$ $$ \therefore \Delta h = \frac{\lambda}{2n}, \quad \Delta x = \frac{\Delta h}{\sin\phi} \approx \frac{\Delta h}{\phi} = \frac{\lambda}{2n\phi}. $$

The distance between adjacent bright fringes is $\Delta x = \frac{\lambda}{2n\phi}$.

⑤ Fresnel Equations

Fresnel Equations

The velocity $\vec{v}$, electric vector $\vec{E}$, and magnetic vector $\vec{B}$ of the incident, reflected, and refracted light form a right-handed spiral relationship.

In the figure, $\vec{v}, \vec{v}_1, \vec{v}_2$ are known. Once a set of $\vec{E}_1, \vec{E}_2, \vec{E}_3$ or $\vec{B}_1, \vec{B}_2, \vec{B}_3$ is arbitrarily given, the other set can be given by decomposing each vector into components.

From the continuity of the components (they do not change abruptly after reflection and refraction at the interface), we get:

$$ E_{s1} = E_{s1}' + E_{s2}, \quad E_{p1}\cos\alpha = -E_{p1}'\cos\alpha - E_{p2}\cos\beta \quad (1) $$ $$ B_{s1} = B_{s1}' - B_{s2}, \quad B_{p1}\cos\alpha = -B_{p1}'\cos\alpha + B_{p2}\cos\beta \quad (2) $$ $$ \text{Also } \because B_{s1} = \sqrt{\epsilon_1\mu_1} E_{p1}, \quad B_{s1}' = \sqrt{\epsilon_1\mu_1} E_{p1}', \quad B_{s2} = \sqrt{\epsilon_2\mu_2} E_{p2}. \quad \text{For light waves, } \mu_1 = \mu_2 = \mu_0. $$ $$ \therefore \sqrt{\epsilon_1} E_{p1} = \sqrt{\epsilon_1} E_{p1}' - \sqrt{\epsilon_2} E_{p2} \implies n_1 E_{p1} = n_1 E_{p1}' - n_2 E_{p2} $$ $$ \text{Also } \because n_1 \sin\alpha = n_2 \sin\beta \quad \therefore E_{p1} = E_{p1}' - \frac{\sin\beta}{\sin\alpha} E_{p2} \quad (3) $$

Combining (1) and (3) yields $E_{p1}\cos\alpha = -\cos\alpha\left(E_{p1} + \frac{\sin\beta}{\sin\alpha} E_{p2}\right) - E_{p2}\cos\beta$

$$ \therefore \frac{E_{p2}}{E_{p1}} = -\frac{2\cos\alpha \sin\beta}{\sin\alpha\cos\alpha + \sin\beta\cos\beta} = -\frac{2\cos\alpha \sin\beta}{\frac{1}{2}(\sin 2\alpha + \sin 2\beta)} = -\frac{2\cos\alpha \sin\beta}{\sin(\alpha+\beta)\cos(\alpha-\beta)} $$

Similarly, $E_{p1}\cos\alpha = -E_{p1}'\cos\alpha - \frac{\sin\alpha}{\sin\beta}(E_{p1} - E_{p1}')\cos\beta$

$$ \therefore \frac{E_{p1}'}{E_{p1}} = \frac{\sin\alpha\cos\beta - \cos\alpha\sin\beta}{\sin\alpha\cos\beta + \cos\alpha\sin\beta} = \frac{\tan(\alpha-\beta)}{\tan(\alpha+\beta)} $$

Also it can be proven:

$$ \frac{E_{s1}'}{E_{s1}} = -\frac{\sin(\alpha-\beta)}{\sin(\alpha+\beta)} $$ $$ \frac{E_{s2}}{E_{s1}} = \frac{2\sin\beta\cos\alpha}{\sin(\alpha+\beta)} $$

This explains the half-wave loss when light reflecting from an optically denser medium.

2. Diffraction of Light

According to Huygens' principle, every point on the wavefront of light emitted by a source becomes a wavelet source emitting spherical wavelets. For the localized wavefront, these wavelets are coherent, and the amplitude vector of the light wave at a certain point in front of the wavefront is the superposition of the amplitude vectors of these wavelets at that point.

$$ E_1 = E_{10} \cos(\omega t - kr_1 + \varphi_1) $$ $$ E_2 = E_{20} \cos(\omega t - kr_2 + \varphi_2) $$ $$ \therefore E_0^2 = E_{10}^2 + E_{20}^2 + 2E_{10}E_{20}\cos[\varphi_1 - \varphi_2 - k(r_1-r_2)] $$ $$ \because I \propto E^2 \quad \therefore I = I_1 + I_2 + 2\sqrt{I_1 I_2}\cos\Delta\varphi $$

① Fraunhofer Single Slit Diffraction

Fraunhofer Single Slit Diffraction

Intensity at point P: $I = I_0 \left(\frac{\sin\beta}{\beta}\right)^2, \quad \beta = \frac{\pi a}{\lambda}\sin\theta \implies \sin\theta = \frac{\beta}{\pi}\frac{\lambda}{a}$. (Can be derived using Fresnel zones)

$$ \begin{cases} \text{Dark fringes: } \sin\beta = 0, \text{ taking } \beta = \pm\pi, \pm 2\pi \dots \\ \quad \text{Yields } \sin\theta = 0 \text{ (central maximum)}, \quad \sin\theta = \pm 1.43\frac{\lambda}{a}, \pm 2.46\frac{\lambda}{a}, \pm 3.47\frac{\lambda}{a} \dots \\ \text{Bright fringes: } \beta = \pm n\pi, \text{ giving } I = 0 \\ \quad \text{Yields } \sin\theta = \pm n\frac{\lambda}{a} \end{cases} $$

Define central bright fringe width as the distance between the centers of the two adjacent first-order dark fringes. Then $\Delta x \approx 2f \cdot \theta \approx 2f \cdot \frac{\lambda}{a}$ (when $n=1$).

② Diffraction Grating

(An optical element composed of a large number of parallel slits of equal width and equal spacing is called a grating)

Diffraction Grating

Grating constant $d = a+b$

Principal maxima: $d\sin\theta = \pm k\lambda \quad \left(\text{i.e. } \delta = 2k \cdot \frac{\lambda}{2}\right)$

③ Circular Aperture Diffraction

Circular Aperture Diffraction $$ d\sin\theta_1 = 1.22\lambda \implies \theta_1 \approx 1.22\frac{\lambda}{d} $$

According to geometrical optics, as long as a lens has an appropriate focal length, any tiny object can be magnified to any extent. But the fact is not so! Because the light emitted from an object point S passing through the lens (circular aperture), its image is no longer a point, but an Airy disk.

Therefore, the minimum angular separation of two object points that the human eye can resolve is $\Delta\theta = \theta_1 = 1.22\frac{\lambda}{d}$. The linear resolution is $\Delta l = d \cdot \Delta\theta = d \cdot 1.22\frac{\lambda}{x}$

($d$: distance of distinct vision $25\text{cm}$, $x$: pupil diameter $2-3\text{mm}$, $\lambda$: wavelength of incident light)

④ X-ray Diffraction

Used to study the internal structure of crystals by diffraction of X-rays in the crystal lattice.

X-ray Diffraction $$ \delta = 2d\sin\varphi $$ $$ \therefore 2d\sin\varphi = k\lambda, \quad \text{constructive interference fringes. — Bragg's law.} $$

3. Polarization of Light

Polarization of Light $$ I_1 = \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}} \Sigma E_{1i}^2 $$ $$ I_2 = \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}} \Sigma (E_{1i}\cos\alpha)^2 $$ $$ \therefore I_2 = I_1\cos^2\alpha \quad \text{(Malus's law)} $$

Part 5: Quantum Optics

1. Bohr Atomic Theory

① Hypotheses:

  1. Electrons in uniform circular motion do not radiate energy.
  2. Electrons absorb photons to jump to higher energy levels (or even cause photoelectric effect), and radiate photons to jump to lower energy levels (ground state: $n=1$).
  3. $mvr = n\frac{h}{2\pi}, \quad n=1, 2, 3 \dots$

② Inferences and Derivations:

$$ r = \frac{\epsilon_0 h^2}{\pi m e^2}n^2 = n^2 r_1, \quad v = \frac{e^2}{2\epsilon_0 h}\frac{1}{n} = \frac{1}{n}v_1, \quad E = -\frac{me^4}{8\epsilon_0^2 h^2}\frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{1}{n^2}E_1 $$

1) $E = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 - \frac{ke^2}{r}$

$$ \because \frac{ke^2}{r^2} = m\frac{v^2}{r} \implies \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{ke^2}{2r}, \quad v = \sqrt{\frac{ke^2}{mr}} $$ $$ \therefore E = -\frac{ke^2}{2r} $$

Substitute $v = \sqrt{\frac{ke^2}{mr}}$ into $mvr = n\frac{h}{2\pi}$, we get $m^2 r^2 \frac{ke^2}{mr} = n^2\frac{h^2}{4\pi^2}$

Solving for $r$: $r = \frac{\epsilon_0 h^2}{\pi m e^2}n^2$. $E = -\frac{me^4}{8\epsilon_0^2 h^2}\frac{1}{n^2} \quad (E_1 = -13.6\text{eV})$.

$v = \frac{e^2}{2\epsilon_0 h}\frac{1}{n}$. $\therefore h\nu = \frac{me^4}{8\epsilon_0^2 h^2}\left(\frac{1}{n^2} - \frac{1}{m^2}\right)$. Work function $n \to \infty, W = \frac{me^4}{8\epsilon_0^2 h^2}$.

2) $\because pr = n\hbar$

$$ \therefore E = \frac{p^2}{2m} - \frac{ke^2}{r} = \frac{p^2}{2m} - \frac{ke^2 p}{n\hbar} = \frac{1}{2m}\left(p - \frac{kme^2}{n\hbar}\right)^2 - \frac{k^2 me^4}{2n^2\hbar^2} $$ $$ \because \text{The energy is most stable when it is minimum,} \quad \therefore E_{\text{min}} = -\frac{k^2 me^4}{2n^2\hbar^2} = -\frac{me^4}{16\pi^2\epsilon_0^2 \cdot 2\hbar^2}\frac{1}{n^2} = -\frac{me^4}{8\epsilon_0^2 h^2}\frac{1}{n^2}. $$

3) From uncertainty principle: $\Delta p \cdot \Delta r \approx h, \quad p \cdot r = n\hbar$.

$$ \therefore E = \frac{p^2}{2m} - \frac{ke^2}{r} = \frac{1}{2m}\frac{n^2\hbar^2}{r^2} - \frac{ke^2}{r} = \frac{n^2\hbar^2}{2m}\left(\frac{1}{r^2} - \frac{2mke^2}{n^2\hbar^2}\frac{1}{r} + \frac{m^2 k^2 e^4}{n^4\hbar^4}\right) - \frac{mk^2 e^4}{2n^2\hbar^2} \ge -\frac{k^2 me^4}{2n^2\hbar^2}. $$

4) Matter wave condition: $2\pi r = n\lambda$.

$$ \therefore r = \frac{n\lambda}{2\pi} = \frac{n\hbar}{p} \implies pr = \frac{n\hbar}{2\pi} \times 2\pi = n\hbar. $$

(Matter wave: de Broglie wave $E = mc^2 = h\nu, p = \frac{h\nu}{c} = \frac{h}{\lambda} = mv$).

Matter Wave Standing Wave

2. Photoelectric Effect

$$ h\nu = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + W $$ $$ \begin{cases} E = h\nu: \text{ photon energy} \\ \frac{1}{2}mv^2: \text{ maximum initial kinetic energy of photoelectron} \\ W: \text{ work function} \end{cases} $$

① Cutoff frequency (red limit): When $v=0$, $\nu_0 = \frac{W}{h}$. For a specific metal, $W$ is constant.

② Saturation current: $\because$ Incident light intensity $\phi = Nh\nu$, and photocurrent intensity $I = nev\Delta S = \frac{N}{\Delta S v \Delta t} \cdot e \Delta S v = \frac{Ne}{\Delta t}$. $\therefore \frac{\phi}{h\nu} = \frac{I\Delta t}{e}$.

③ Reverse stopping voltage: When $eU_0 = \frac{1}{2}mv^2$, the photocurrent reduces to zero, $\therefore U_0 = \frac{h\nu - W}{e}$

3. Inverse Photoelectric Effect

Inverse Photoelectric Effect $$ E = E' + h\nu $$

Special Topic: Light Propagation in Optical Fibers

Light propagation in optical fiber

The radial distribution of refractive index is $n^2 = n_0^2(1 - \alpha^2 r^2)$.

$$ \begin{cases} n \sin\theta = n_0 \sin\theta_0 \\ \sin\theta = \cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2} - \theta\right) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + \tan^2\left(\frac{\pi}{2} - \theta\right)}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dr}{dx}\right)^2}} \end{cases} $$ $$ \therefore \left(\frac{dr}{dx}\right)^2 = \frac{n^2}{n_0^2 \sin^2\theta_0} - 1 $$

Taking the derivative with respect to $x$:

$$ 2 \left(\frac{dr}{dx}\right) \frac{d^2 r}{dx^2} = \frac{1}{n_0^2 \sin^2\theta_0} \frac{d(n^2)}{dr} \cdot \frac{dr}{dx} $$ $$ \therefore 2 \frac{d^2 r}{dx^2} = \frac{1}{n_0^2 \sin^2\theta_0} (-2n_0^2 \alpha^2 r) $$

i.e., $\frac{d^2 r}{dx^2} + \frac{\alpha^2}{\sin^2\theta_0} r = 0$. Solving this differential equation yields $r = A \sin\left(\frac{\alpha}{\sin\theta_0} x + \varphi_0\right)$.

At $x = 0$, $r = 0$, so $A \sin\varphi_0 = 0$.

And at $x = 0$, $\frac{dr}{dx} = A \frac{\alpha}{\sin\theta_0} \cos\varphi_0$; therefore $A \frac{\alpha}{\sin\theta_0} \cos\varphi_0 = \frac{\cos\theta_0}{\sin\theta_0} \implies A\alpha \cos\varphi_0 = \cos\theta_0$.

Solving gives $\varphi_0 = 0, A = \frac{\cos\theta_0}{\alpha}$.

Therefore, the trajectory equation of the light ray is $r = \frac{\cos\theta_0}{\alpha} \sin\left(\frac{\alpha}{\sin\theta_0} x\right)$.

Sinusoidal trajectory in optical fiber

Special Topic: Interaction between Electron and Photon

1. Photon causes bound electron to jump (Bound atom)

$$ h\nu = \frac{me^4}{8\varepsilon_0^2 h^2} \left(\frac{1}{m^2} - \frac{1}{n^2}\right) $$

2. Photon causes free atom to jump (Free atom)

$$ h\nu = E_j - E_i + \frac{P_{\text{atom}} \cdot \frac{h\nu}{c}}{M} \cos\alpha - \frac{\left(\frac{h\nu}{c}\right)^2}{2M} $$ $$ = \frac{me^4}{8\varepsilon_0^2 h^2} \left(\frac{1}{m^2} - \frac{1}{n^2}\right) + \frac{P_{\text{atom}} h\nu}{Mc} \cos\alpha - \frac{(h\nu)^2}{2Mc^2} $$

3. Photon causes electron to escape (Photoelectric effect)

$$ h\nu = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + W = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{me^4}{8\varepsilon_0^2 h^2} $$

4. Photon causes electron to scatter (Compton effect on free electron at rest)

Compton scattering

① Hypothesis: If a free electron at rest can absorb a photon, it must satisfy momentum and energy conservation:

$$ \begin{cases} \frac{h\nu}{c} = P_e \\ h\nu + m_0 c^2 = \sqrt{P_e^2 c^2 + m_0^2 c^4} \implies \frac{h\nu}{c} = \sqrt{P_e^2 + m_0^2 c^2} \end{cases} $$

These two equations are contradictory. Therefore, a free electron at rest cannot produce the photoelectric effect.

② Photon and free electron at rest produce the Compton effect.

$$ \begin{cases} (m v)^2 = \left(\frac{h\nu}{c}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{h\nu'}{c}\right)^2 - 2\frac{h\nu}{c}\frac{h\nu'}{c}\cos\theta \\ m_0 c^2 + h\nu = mc^2 + h\nu' \\ m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} \end{cases} $$ $$ \therefore \frac{1}{\nu'} - \frac{1}{\nu} = \frac{2h}{m_0 c^2} \sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} $$ $$ \therefore \frac{c}{\nu'} - \frac{c}{\nu} = \frac{2h}{m_0 c} \sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} \implies \Delta\lambda = \frac{2h}{m_0 c} \sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} = 2\lambda_c \sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} $$

Also, from momentum conservation:

$$ \begin{cases} \frac{h\nu}{c} \sin\theta = mv \sin\varphi \\ \frac{h\nu}{c} = \frac{h\nu'}{c}\cos\theta + mv\cos\varphi \end{cases} $$ $$ \therefore \tan\varphi = \frac{\frac{h\nu'}{c}\sin\theta}{\frac{h\nu}{c} - \frac{h\nu'}{c}\cos\theta} = \frac{\sin\theta}{\frac{\nu}{\nu'} - \cos\theta} = \frac{\sin\theta}{1-\cos\theta + \frac{\Delta\lambda}{\lambda}} $$ $$ = \frac{2\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\cos\frac{\theta}{2}}{2\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} + 2\frac{\lambda_c}{\lambda}\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}} = \frac{\cot\frac{\theta}{2}}{1 + \lambda_c/\lambda} $$ $$ \therefore \tan\varphi \tan\frac{\theta}{2} = \frac{1}{1 + \lambda_c/\lambda} = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{h}{m_0 c \lambda}} $$

Special Topic: Neutron Gravity Interference

1. Basic duality of neutron waves and particles:

$$ \Psi(\vec{r}, t) = C e^{i(\vec{p}\cdot\vec{r} - E\cdot t)/\hbar} $$

Its phase $(\vec{p}\cdot\vec{r} - E\cdot t)/\hbar$ is invariant under Lorentz transformation, requiring that $(\vec{p}, iE/c)$ form a four-vector, therefore $E=mc^2$, $p=mv$.

2. Neutron gravity interferometer:

Neutron gravity interferometer top view Neutron gravity interferometer 3D view

A neutron beam enters the interferometer from $A$. It is split into two beams by the beam splitter. Let the de Broglie wavelength of the neutron at this time be $\lambda_0$.

The neutrons in the $AB$ and $DC$ segments are subjected to gravity, so their momentum becomes smaller, hence their wavelength becomes longer. Also because the optical path is $N_{\text{opt}} = \int \frac{ds}{\lambda}$:

$\therefore$ The two neutron beams have the same optical path in segments $AB$ and $DC$, but a path difference is produced in segments $AD$ and $BC$.

Let the wavelength of the two neutron beams at point $C$ be $\lambda$. Since the optical path of one beam in $BC$ is $\frac{a}{\lambda_0}$, and the optical path of the other beam in $AD$ is $\frac{a}{\lambda}$, an optical path difference $AD\left(\frac{1}{\lambda_0} - \frac{1}{\lambda}\right)$ is produced, and the two neutron beams interfere at $C$.

3. Optical path difference calculation:

$\because$ The height difference is $H = \left(\frac{a}{\cos\theta}\right) \cdot \sin2\theta \cdot \sin\varphi = 2a \sin\theta \sin\varphi$.

$$ \therefore \frac{1}{2m} \left(\frac{h}{\lambda_0}\right)^2 - \frac{1}{2m} \left(\frac{h}{\lambda}\right)^2 = mgH = mg \cdot 2a \sin\theta \sin\varphi $$

(Since slow neutrons are used in the experiment, the non-relativistic $p-E$ relation can be used).

$$ \therefore \left(\frac{1}{\lambda_0} - \frac{1}{\lambda}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\lambda_0} + \frac{1}{\lambda}\right) \approx \left(\frac{1}{\lambda_0} - \frac{1}{\lambda}\right) \cdot \frac{2}{\lambda_0} = \frac{4m^2 g a \sin\theta \sin\varphi}{h^2} $$ $$ \therefore \frac{1}{\lambda_0} - \frac{1}{\lambda} = \frac{2m^2 g a \sin\theta \sin\varphi \lambda_0}{h^2} $$ $$ \therefore \Delta N_{\text{opt}} = \left(\frac{1}{\lambda_0} - \frac{1}{\lambda}\right) \cdot \frac{a}{\cos\theta} = \frac{2m^2 g a^2 \lambda_0 \tan\theta \sin\varphi}{h^2} $$

Special Topic: Methods for Determining the Speed of Light in the Laboratory

1. Rotating Toothed Wheel Method (1849, Fizeau)

Fizeau's rotating toothed wheel apparatus

The light emitted from the point light source $S$ will converge and pass through the gap between two teeth of $W$ after being reflected by the half-silvered mirror $A$.

After reflection by $M$, it converges again at the toothed wheel. At this time, if the wheel has rotated exactly such that the light is blocked by a tooth, the observer will not see the light.

Let the speed of the wheel when the light reflected from mirror $M$ is blocked for the first time be $n$; the time required for one tooth to rotate to the next gap is $\Delta t$, and the total number of teeth on the wheel is $N$.

$$ \because \Delta \theta = \omega \Delta t \implies \frac{2\pi}{2N} = \omega \Delta t $$ $$ \text{Also } \omega = 2\pi n $$

Solving gives $\Delta t = \frac{1}{2nN}$.

Since the light has traveled back and forth over a distance $l$, $\Delta t = \frac{2l}{c}$.

$$ \therefore \frac{2l}{c} = \frac{1}{2nN} \implies c = 4nNl $$

2. Rotating Mirror Method (1851, Foucault)

Foucault's rotating mirror apparatus

Let the angle the mirror $M_1$ rotated in time $\Delta t$ be $\Delta\alpha$; the reflected light will rotate by $2\Delta\alpha$. Therefore, the displacement of the image is $\Delta s = 2\Delta\alpha \cdot l$ (where $l$ is the distance from the lens $L$ to $S$ or $S'$).

Also, the light has traveled back and forth once between $M_2$ and $M_1$, so $\Delta t = \frac{2l_0}{c}$ (where $l_0$ is the distance between $M_2$ and $M_1$).

$$ \text{And } \because \Delta\alpha = \omega \Delta t $$ $$ \therefore \Delta s = 2\Delta\alpha \cdot l = 2\omega l \Delta t = \frac{4\omega l l_0}{c} $$ $$ \therefore c = \frac{4\omega l l_0}{\Delta s} $$

3. Rotating Prism Method (1926, Michelson)

Michelson's rotating prism apparatus

Let the distance between stations $A$ and $B$ be $L$. To get the light reflected from face $b$ to face $b'$ (to maintain the stationary image), the time taken is $\Delta t = \frac{\Delta\theta}{\omega}$, and the travel time of light is $\Delta t = \frac{2L}{c}$.

$$ \therefore c = \frac{2L\omega}{\Delta\theta} $$

For an octagonal prism, $\Delta\theta = \frac{2\pi}{8} = \frac{\pi}{4}$.


Special Topic: Speed of Light vs Speed of Sound; Optical and Acoustic Doppler Effect

1. Speed of Light vs Speed of Sound

Speed of Light:

$$ c = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\varepsilon\mu}} \quad \text{where } \varepsilon = \varepsilon_r \varepsilon_0, \; \mu = \mu_r \mu_0 \quad \text{and } \lambda\nu = c $$

Speed of Sound:

$$ v = \sqrt{\frac{\gamma RT}{\mu}} $$

(where $\mu$ is the macroscopic average molar mass of the air)

2. Doppler Effect

① Optical Doppler Effect

In the Michelson-Morley experiment, the interference fringes did not shift, which indicates that from frame $S$ to frame $S'$ (inertial frames), the phase of the wave does not change: $A(x,y,z,t) = A_0 e^{i(\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r} - \omega t)}$, i.e.,

$$ \vec{k}'\cdot\vec{r}' - \omega' t' = \vec{k}\cdot\vec{r} - \omega t $$

Since $k = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda}$ and $\omega = 2\pi\nu$, the four-components of the wave vector $(k_x, k_y, k_z, i\frac{\omega}{c})$ obey the Lorentz transformation. Thus we have:

$$ \frac{\omega}{c} = \gamma\left(-\beta k_x' + \frac{\omega'}{c}\right) $$

Substituting $k_x' = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda'}\cos\theta = \frac{2\pi\nu'}{c}\cos\theta$ and $\omega' = 2\pi\nu'$, we get:

$$ \frac{2\pi\nu}{c} = \gamma\left(-\beta \frac{2\pi\nu'}{c}\cos\theta + \frac{2\pi\nu'}{c}\right) $$

Solving for $\nu'$ yields the relativistic optical Doppler effect formula:

$$ \nu' = \frac{\nu}{\gamma(1-\beta\cos\theta)} = \nu \frac{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}{1-\beta\cos\theta} $$

(where $\beta = \frac{v}{c}$, and $v$ is the velocity of the observer relative to the source.)

② Acoustic Doppler Effect

If the wave source moves relative to the medium with velocity $v_S$, then the wave speed is unchanged relative to the medium, but the wavelength changes:

$$ \nu' = \frac{v}{\lambda'} = \frac{v}{\frac{v}{\nu} - \frac{v_S\cos\alpha}{\nu}} = \nu \frac{v}{v - v_S\cos\alpha} $$

If the observer moves relative to the medium with velocity $v_R$, then the wavelength is unchanged, but the wave speed changes relative to the observer:

$$ \nu'' = \frac{v + v_R\cos\beta}{\lambda} = \nu' \frac{v + v_R\cos\beta}{v} $$

Combining the above, the general acoustic Doppler effect formula is:

$$ \nu_{obs} = \frac{v + v_R\cos\beta}{v - v_S\cos\alpha} \cdot \nu $$

Special Topic: High School Physics Experiments (Optics)

Experiment 12: Measure the Refractive Index of Glass

Experiment Objective: Measure the refractive index of a glass block.

Equipment: White paper, parallel-sided glass block, thumbtacks, pins, pencil, compass, triangle ruler.

Principle: Based on Snell's Law, $n = \frac{\sin i}{\sin r}$. By placing pins to trace the path of a light ray passing through the glass block and drawing the incident and refracted rays, we can measure the angles and calculate the refractive index.

Measuring Refractive Index Setup

Experiment 13: Use Double-Slit Interference to Measure the Wavelength of Light

Experiment Objective: Measure the wavelength of monochromatic light.

Equipment: Light source, color filter, single slit, double slit, light shield tube (with screen and optical bench), measuring microscope.

Double-Slit Interference Apparatus

Principle & Procedure:

The distance between adjacent bright (or dark) fringes is given by:

$$ \Delta x = \frac{L}{d}\lambda $$

The distance between fringes is measured using the measuring microscope (consisting of a graduated reticle, eyepiece, handwheel, and micrometer). Measuring the distance between two adjacent fringes directly as $\Delta x = |a_1 - a_2|$ has a large error. Usually, we measure the distance $a$ spanning across $n$ fringes, so:

$$ \Delta x = \frac{a}{n-1} $$

Use a ruler to measure the distance $L$ from the double slit to the screen. The slit spacing $d$ is a known parameter of the apparatus.

$$ \therefore \lambda = \frac{d}{L}\Delta x $$